Yeah, and actually later I've found someone mentioned that
they had done some benchmarks and found that replication
is faster than collection distribution.
Thanks
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Alireza Salimi wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > If
On Oct 27, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Alireza Salimi wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> If we ignore the features that Replication provides (
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Features),
> which approach is better?
> Is there any performance problems with Replication?
>
> Replications seems quite easier
Indeed, I can not see any of the 3 images here :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Admin_Page_for_Replication
It just displays the name of image file, as the img url seem to point to
a logged-only link such as this one :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication?action=AttachFile&do=ge
So I have to ask my question again.
Is there any reason not to use Replication in Solr and use Collection
Distribution?
Thanks
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Alireza Salimi wrote:
> I can't see those benchmarks, can you?
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
>> Replicatio
I can't see those benchmarks, can you?
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
> Replication is easier to manage and a bit faster. See the performance
> numbers: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/C
Replication is easier to manage and a bit faster. See the performance
numbers: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-Distribution-vs-Replication-in-Solr-tp3458724p3459178.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing li
