On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> You can also use this query format:
>
> id:(123 OR 456 OR 789)
>
> This does get expanded internally by the query parser to the format that has
> the field name on every clause, but it is sometimes easier to write code
> that produces the abo
I wanted to be explicit for the OP.
Vut wouldn't that depend on mm if you are using (e)dismax?
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> In fact,
In fact, you shouldn't need OR:
id:(123 456 789)
will default to OR.
Upayavira
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 1:49 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> How about id1 OR id2 OR id3? :
On 11/19/2012 1:49 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
Hi,
How about id1 OR id2 OR id3? :)
Thank, Otis. This was my first inclination (id:123 OR 456), but it
didn't work when I tried. At your instigation I tried then id:123 OR
id:456. This does wor
If you are in Solr 4 you could use realtime get and list the ids that you
need. For example:
http://host:port/solr/mycore/get?ids=my_id_1,my_id_2...
See http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/solr/RealTime+Get
Tomás
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodne...@gm
