Thanks for your feedback. Upgrading SolrJ is going to be a bit difficult
(because it's tied in with a framework which is only partially owned by
us), so we'll just have to find another way to deal with it.
Karel
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 7:40 AM, Kare
On 12/13/2013 7:40 AM, Karel Vervaeke wrote:
> IIUC A Solrj 4.4 client should be able to speak to a Solr 4.6 cloud
> instance.
> Assuming this is correct there's an issue because of a change in
> clusterstate.json:
>
> In a 4.4 cloud server clusterstate.json would contain `router: "implicit"`
> In
