You do not want to add a new shard, first you want your docs evenly
spread, secondly, they are spread using hash ranges, to add more
capacity, you spread out those hash ranges using shard splitting.
"Adding" a new shard doesnt really make any sense here. Unless you go
for implicit routing where you
Yes, shard splitting will only help in managing large clusters and to improve
query performance. In my case as index size is fully grown (no capacity to hold
in the existing shards) across the collection adding a new shard will help and
for which I have to re index.
> On 01-Aug-2015, at 6:34 p
Erm, that doesn't seem to make sense. Seems like you are talking about
*merging* shards.
Say you had two shards, 3m docs each:
shard1: 3m docs
shard2: 3m docs
If you split shard1, you would have:
shard1_0: 1.5m docs
shard1_1: 1.5m docs
shard2: 3m docs
You could, of course, then split shard2. Y
If my current shard is holding 3 million documents will the new subshard after
splitting also be able to hold 3 million documents?
If that is the case After shard splitting the sub shards should hold 6 million
documents if a shard is split in to two. Am I right?
> On 01-Aug-2015, at 5:43 pm, Upa
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015, at 11:29 PM, naga sharathrayapati wrote:
> I am using solrj to index documents
>
> i agree with you regarding the index update but i should not see any
> deleted documents as it is a fresh index. Can we actually identify what
> are
> those deleted documents?
If you post doc
I am using solrj to index documents
i agree with you regarding the index update but i should not see any
deleted documents as it is a fresh index. Can we actually identify what are
those deleted documents?
if there is no option of adding shards to existing collection i do not like
the idea of re
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015, at 10:30 PM, naga sharathrayapati wrote:
> I have an exception with one of the document after indexing 6 mil
> documents
> out of 10 mil, is there any way i can avoid re indexing the 6 mil
> documents?
How are you indexing your documents? Are you using the DIH? Personally,
I
