Re: Architectural help

2010-03-12 Thread Erick Erickson
TH has a Right To Life, > otherwise we all die. > > Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded' > Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php > > > --- On Thu, 3/11/10, Constantijn Visinescu wrote: > > > From: Constantijn Visinescu > > Subject: Re: Architectural

Re: Architectural help

2010-03-11 Thread Dennis Gearon
Visinescu wrote: > From: Constantijn Visinescu > Subject: Re: Architectural help > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 5:25 AM > Assuming you create the view in such > a way that it returns 1 row for each > solrdocument you want indexed: yes > &

Re: Architectural help

2010-03-11 Thread Chris Hostetter
: We have about 5M records ranging in size all coming from a DB source (only 2 : tables). What will be the most efficient way of indexing all of these : documents? I am looking at DIH but before I go down that road I wanted to The main question to ask yourself is what your indexing freshness req

Re: Architectural help

2010-03-11 Thread Constantijn Visinescu
Assuming you create the view in such a way that it returns 1 row for each solrdocument you want indexed: yes On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:54 PM, blargy wrote: > > So I can just create a view (or temporary table) and then just have a > simple > "select * from (view or table)" in my DIH config? > >

Re: Architectural help

2010-03-10 Thread blargy
So I can just create a view (or temporary table) and then just have a simple "select * from (view or table)" in my DIH config? Constantijn Visinescu wrote: > > Try making a database view that contains everything you want to index, and > then just use the DIH. > > Worked when i tested it ;) >

Re: Architectural help

2010-03-10 Thread Constantijn Visinescu
Try making a database view that contains everything you want to index, and then just use the DIH. Worked when i tested it ;) On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:56 AM, blargy wrote: > > I was wondering if someone could be so kind to give me some architectural > guidance. > > A little about our setup. We