Hi Brad:
We have since (Bobo) added some perf tests which allows you to do some
benchmarking very quickly:
http://code.google.com/p/bobo-browse/wiki/BoboPerformance
Let me know if you need help setting up.
-John
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail
SOLR 1.4 has a new feature
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-475that speeds up faceting
on fields with many terms by adding
an UnInvertedField.
Bobo uses a custom field cache as well. It may be useful to benchmark the 3
different approaches (bitsets, SOLR-475, Bobo). This could be a good w
Thanks for this -- we're also trying out bobo-browse for Lucene, and
early results look pretty enticing. They greatly sped up how fast you
read in documents from disk, among other things:
http://bobo-browse.wiki.sourceforge.net/
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Shalin Shekhar
Mangar wrote:
> On S
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Bradford Stephens <
bradfordsteph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the facet aggregation take place on the Solr search server, or
> the Solr client?
>
> It's pretty slow for me -- on a machine with 8 cores/ 8 GB RAM, 50
> million document index (about 36M unique values
>
> Does the facet aggregation take place on the Solr search server, or the
> Solr client?
>
Solr server.
Faceting is an expensive operation by nature, especially when the hits are
large in number. Solr caches these values once computed. You might want to
tweak cache related parameters in your sol
Does the facet aggregation take place on the Solr search server, or
the Solr client?
It's pretty slow for me -- on a machine with 8 cores/ 8 GB RAM, 50
million document index (about 36M unique values in the "author"
field), a query that returns 131,000 hits takes about 20 seconds to
calculate the
Oh, wow... I think that faceted search is the right path, especially
since seeing this amazing site:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Articles/Faceted-Search-Solr
I hope it's performant over hundreds of thousands of search results :)
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:13 PM,
It looks like field collapsing may be the key:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
But it also doesn't seem to be 'finalized' yet. I wonder how
performant it is with indexes of 50 million documents+?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:42 PM, shb wrote:
> you can refer to the facet search of solr,
you can refer to the facet search of solr, that might help you.
2009/7/10 Bradford Stephens
> Greetings,
>
> We've been experimenting with grouping fields returned from document
> search results in Lucene, and we haven't gotten anything very
> encouraging. Basically, the more results we return,
