On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>
>> RE SIS... I wonder how the expertise on that project compares to that of
>> JTS's Martin Davis -- an expert, and the library has been in use for 10
>> years.
>
> Time will tell. I'd favor the Apache model where instead of name
ertise p a group of like minded individuals.
Cheers,
Chris
>
> ~ David
>
> From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 1:00 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: Adam Estrada
&
> Does anyone know of a patch or even when this functionality might be included
> in to Solr4.0? I need to query for polygons ;-)
check:
http://code.google.com/p/lucene-spatial-playground/
This is my sketch / soon-to-be-proposal for what I think lucene
spatial should look like. It includes a WK
a.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 1:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Adam Estrada
Subject: Re: [WKT] Spatial Searching
LGPL licenses and Apache aren't exactly compatible, see:
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition-examples-lgpl
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#ca
LGPL licenses and Apache aren't exactly compatible, see:
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition-examples-lgpl
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
In practice, this was the reason we started the SIS project.
Cheers,
Chris
On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Smiley, David W
Outstanding! Thanks David...I can't wait to take a look at it.
Adam
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 28, 2011, at 2:16 PM, "Smiley, David W." wrote:
> (This is one of those messages that I would have responded to at the time if
> I only noticed it.)
>
> There is not yet indexing of arbitrary shape
(This is one of those messages that I would have responded to at the time if I
only noticed it.)
There is not yet indexing of arbitrary shapes (i.e. your data can only be
points), but with SOLR-2155 you can query via WKT thanks to JTS. If you want
to index shapes then you'll have to wait a mon
Thought I would share this on web mapping...it's a great write up and something
to consider when talking about working with spatial data.
http://www.tokumine.com/2010/09/20/gis-data-payload-sizes/
Adam
On Feb 9, 2011, at 7:03 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> The show stopper for JTS is it's licen
Grant,
How could i stub this out not being a java guy? What is needed in order to do
this?
Licensing is always going to be an issue with JTS which is why I am interested
in the project SIS sitting in incubation right now.
I'm willing to put forth the effort if I had a little direction on how
Thought I would share this on web mapping...it's a great write up and something
to consider when talking about working with spatial data.
http://www.tokumine.com/2010/09/20/gis-data-payload-sizes/
Adam
On Feb 9, 2011, at 7:03 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> The show stopper for JTS is it's lice
How could i stub this out not being a java guy? What is needed in order to do
this?
Licensing is always going to be an issue with JTS which is why I am interested
in the project SIS sitting in incubation right now.
I willing to put forth the effort if I had a little direction from the peanut
The show stopper for JTS is it's license, unfortunately. Otherwise, I think it
would be done already! We could, since it's LGPL, make it an optional
dependency, assuming someone can stub it out.
On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Adam Estrada wrote:
> I just came across a ~nudge post over in the SI
+1 to David's patch from SOLR-2155.
It would be great to implement. Great job using GDAL on converting the WKT Adam!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:18 PM, Adam Estrada wrote:
> I just came across a ~nudge post over in the SIS list on what the status is
> for that project. This got me look
13 matches
Mail list logo
