e field
> (float)
> definition to achieve optimal performance?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Randomly-slow-response-times-for-range-queries-tp1441724p1443096.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Also, does anyone know the best precisionStep to use on a trie field (float)
definition to achieve optimal performance?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Randomly-slow-response-times-for-range-queries-tp1441724p1443096.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
ge in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Randomly-slow-response-times-for-range-queries-tp1441724p1443086.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e tried this using the new trie fields, and using standar
> sdouble fields, and have had similar results. Is there a known issue with
> randomly slow queries when doing range searches with Solr?
>
> Thanks for any support you can offer.
> --
> View this message in context:
> htt
standar
sdouble fields, and have had similar results. Is there a known issue with
randomly slow queries when doing range searches with Solr?
Thanks for any support you can offer.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Randomly-slow-response-times-for-range
