: Hi Robert, thanks for the response. I've looked into the query parsers a
: bit and I did find that using the raw parser on a matching multi-word
: keyword works correctly. I need to have shingling though, in order to
: support query phrases. It seems odd to have the query parser emitting
The
ar...@sbcglobal.net]
> >> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 5:06 AM
> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not
> real data
> >>
> >> Anyone got a definitive, authoritative link to the
> definition of a
&g
_indexes
>
> Steve
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net]
>> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 5:06 AM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
>>
>&g
September 03, 2010 5:06 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
>
> Anyone got a definitive, authoritative link to the definition of a
> 'shingle' in search engine results/technology?
>
>
ze = 3. Be
careful, the builing time of index & index dize could be dramatically long &
large as the max shinlge size increases.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Rose"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but no
'shingle' in search engine results/technology?
>
>
> Dennis Gearon
>
> Signature Warning
>
> EARTH has a Right To Life,
> otherwise we all die.
>
> Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
> Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
>
om/film.php
--- On Fri, 9/3/10, Jeff Rose wrote:
> From: Jeff Rose
> Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Friday, September 3, 2010, 1:48 AM
> Thanks Steven and Jonathan, we got it
> working by using a combination of
&
Thanks Steven and Jonathan, we got it working by using a combination of
quoting and the PositionFilterFactory, like is shown below. The
documentation for the position filter doesn't make much sense without
understanding more about how positioning of tokens is taken into account,
but it appears to
On Thu, 9/2/10, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> From: Jonathan Rochkind
> Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Cc: "Vishal Patel" , "Michiel Willekens"
>
> Date: Thursday, September 2, 2010,
I've run into this before too. Both the dismax and solr-lucene _query
parsers_ will tokenize a query on whitespace _before_ they pass the
query to any field analyzers.
There are some reasons for this, lots of things wouldn't work if they
didn't do this.
But it makes your approach kind of har
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Jeff Rose wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > We are using SOLR to match query strings
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Jeff Rose wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > We are using SOLR to match query strings with a keyword database, where
> > some of the keywords are actually more than one word. For example a
> > keyword
> > might be "apple pi
If your use-case is limited to this, why don't you encapsulate all queries in
double quotes?
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 14:21:47 Jeff Rose wrote:
> Hi,
> We are using SOLR to match query strings with a keyword database, where
> some of the keywords are actually more than one word. For exa
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Jeff Rose wrote:
> Hi,
> We are using SOLR to match query strings with a keyword database, where
> some of the keywords are actually more than one word. For example a
> keyword
> might be "apple pie" and we only want it to match for a query containing
> that word
14 matches
Mail list logo
