27;t understand why!
>
> May as well let this drop since we don't seem to be talking about the
> same thing . . . but thanks anyway,
>
> Ian.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
> Sent: 30 November 2009 23:05
> T
mber 2009 23:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: schema-based Index-time field boosting
: I am talking about field boosting rather than document boosting,
ie. I
: would like some fields (say eg. title) to be "louder" than others,
: across ALL documents. I believe you are a
l let this drop since we don't seem to be talking about the
same thing . . . but thanks anyway,
Ian.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: 30 November 2009 23:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: schema-based Index-time field boosti
: I am talking about field boosting rather than document boosting, ie. I
: would like some fields (say eg. title) to be "louder" than others,
: across ALL documents. I believe you are at least partially talking
: about document boosting, which clearly applies on a per-document basis.
index time
: Coming in a bit late but I would like a variant that is not a No-OP.
: Think of something like title:searchstring^10 OR catch_all:searchstring
: Of course I can always add the boosting at query time but it would make
: life easier if I could define a default boost in the schema so that my
: quer
a good idea BTW. Regards,
Ian.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: 23 November 2009 18:34
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: schema-based Index-time field boosting
: Yeah, like I said, I was mistaken about setting field boost in
: schem
On 23.11.2009 19:33 Chris Hostetter wrote:
> ...if there was a way to oost fields at index time that was configured in
> the schema.xml, then every doc would get that boost on it's instances of
> those fields but the only purpose of index time boosting is to indicate
> that one document is more
: Yeah, like I said, I was mistaken about setting field boost in
: schema.xml - doesn't mean it's a bad idea though. At any rate, from
: your penultimate sentence I reckon at least one of us is still confused
: about field boosting, feel free to reply if you think it's me ;)
Yeah ... i think it'
riginal Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: 21 November 2009 01:54
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: schema-based Index-time field boosting
: The field boost attribute was put there by me back in the 1.3 days,
when
: I somehow gained the mistaken
: The field boost attribute was put there by me back in the 1.3 days, when
: I somehow gained the mistaken impression that it was supposed to work!
: Of course, despite a lot of searching I haven't been able to find
: anything to back up my position ;)
solr has never supported anything like a "bo
Hi David, thanks for replying,
The field boost attribute was put there by me back in the 1.3 days, when
I somehow gained the mistaken impression that it was supposed to work!
Of course, despite a lot of searching I haven't been able to find
anything to back up my position ;)
Unfortunately our cod
11 matches
Mail list logo
