al Message-
From: Burton-West, Tom [mailto:tburt...@umich.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: nfs vs sas in production
Hi Kallin,
Given the previous postings on the list about terrible NFS performance we were
pleasantly surprised when we did
Hi Kallin,
Given the previous postings on the list about terrible NFS performance we were
pleasantly surprised when we did some tests against a well tuned NFS RAID array
on a private network. We got reasonably good results (given our large index
sizes.) See
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/lar
Look here for a number of messages on this:
http://markmail.org/search/solr+nfs
You'll find my posting, where indexing on NFS was 100X slower than local disk.
And 276 other e-mails on the subject.
wunder
On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Kallin,
>
> I don't have experien
Kallin,
I don't have experience with SAS storage and don't recall SAS being mentioned
on Lucene/Solr lists. But I do recall NFS being mention on several occasions:
http://search-lucene.com/?q=sas+nfs
http://search-lucene.com/?q=sas+nfs+san
From a few of my quick Google-based quick self-educat
