thank you james for the feedback - i appreciate it.
ultimately - i was trying to decide if i was missing the boat by ONLY using
query time boosting, and i should really be using index time boosting.
but after your reply, reading the solr book, and looking at the lucene dox -
it looks like index-t
m]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 3:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: index-time boosting using DIH
thanks for the reply,
so to use the $docBoost pseudo-field name, would you do something like below
- and would this technique likely inc
thanks for the reply,
so to use the $docBoost pseudo-field name, would you do something like below
- and would this technique likely increase my total index time?
...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/index-tim
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Special_Commands and the
$docBoost pseudo-field name.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: geeky2 [mailto:gee...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.