RE: index-time boosting using DIH

2012-05-22 Thread geeky2
thank you james for the feedback - i appreciate it. ultimately - i was trying to decide if i was missing the boat by ONLY using query time boosting, and i should really be using index time boosting. but after your reply, reading the solr book, and looking at the lucene dox - it looks like index-t

RE: index-time boosting using DIH

2012-05-22 Thread Dyer, James
m] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 3:06 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: index-time boosting using DIH thanks for the reply, so to use the $docBoost pseudo-field name, would you do something like below - and would this technique likely inc

RE: index-time boosting using DIH

2012-05-22 Thread geeky2
thanks for the reply, so to use the $docBoost pseudo-field name, would you do something like below - and would this technique likely increase my total index time? ... -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/index-tim

RE: index-time boosting using DIH

2012-05-22 Thread Dyer, James
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Special_Commands and the $docBoost pseudo-field name. James Dyer E-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: geeky2 [mailto:gee...@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:12 PM To: solr-user@lucene.