Re: fq efficiency

2013-11-10 Thread Joel Bernstein
ds using an analyzer will break > > wildcard search. If there is a wildcard, the query analyzer doesn't run > > filters, so it won't prepend the user id. I could prepend the user id > > myself before calling Solr, but that seems... bad. > > > > Scott > >

Re: fq efficiency

2013-11-08 Thread Erick Erickson
n't prepend the user id. I could prepend the user id > myself before calling Solr, but that seems... bad. > > Scott > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scott Schneider [mailto:scott_schnei...@symantec.com] > > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013

RE: fq efficiency

2013-11-07 Thread Scott Schneider
2013 2:03 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: fq efficiency > > Thanks, that link is very helpful, especially the section, "Leapfrog, > anyone?" This actually seems quite slow for my use case. Suppose we > have 10,000 users and 1,000,000 documents. We

RE: fq efficiency

2013-11-07 Thread Scott Schneider
lyograg.org] > Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 4:35 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: fq efficiency > > On 11/5/2013 3:36 PM, Scott Schneider wrote: > > I'm wondering if filter queries are efficient enough for my use > cases. I have lots and lots of use

Re: fq efficiency

2013-11-05 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 11/5/2013 3:36 PM, Scott Schneider wrote: I'm wondering if filter queries are efficient enough for my use cases. I have lots and lots of users in a big, multi-tenant, sharded index. To run a search, I can use an fq on the user id and pass in the search terms. Does this scale well with th