>I can't think of any value add in having Solr keep track of the fact
that
>"ds" means "Download Speed" vs having an external data mapping keep
track
>of that information, since direct access to that info inside of Solr
>wouldn't typically make the performance of requests any faster or
>reduce the
This would require some storage when the index is built to map between the
internal field name and the "display name" ... since this is not a Lucene
concept it would have to be a higher level concept hat Solr write to disk
directly -- there are currently no concepts like this but that doens't
mean
use problems.
It seems to work just fine.
- Original Message
From: Will Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 1:48:22 PM
Subject: RE: field display values
I would normally agree but the problem is that I'm making very heav
mes as
they come to me in the "Download Speed" format but making the reverse
happen is impossible from the client side because each record is
different.
- will
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 4:32 PM
To: solr-user@l
Will Johnson wrote:
Has anyone done anything interesting to preserve display values for
field names. Ie my users would like to see
Download Speed (MB/sec): 5
As opposed to:
ds:5
The general model has been to think of solr like SQL... it is only the
database - display choices should be