RE: field display values

2007-05-29 Thread Will Johnson
>I can't think of any value add in having Solr keep track of the fact that >"ds" means "Download Speed" vs having an external data mapping keep track >of that information, since direct access to that info inside of Solr >wouldn't typically make the performance of requests any faster or >reduce the

RE: field display values

2007-05-25 Thread Chris Hostetter
This would require some storage when the index is built to map between the internal field name and the "display name" ... since this is not a Lucene concept it would have to be a higher level concept hat Solr write to disk directly -- there are currently no concepts like this but that doens't mean

Re: field display values

2007-05-25 Thread Kevin Osborn
use problems. It seems to work just fine. - Original Message From: Will Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 1:48:22 PM Subject: RE: field display values I would normally agree but the problem is that I'm making very heav

RE: field display values

2007-05-25 Thread Will Johnson
mes as they come to me in the "Download Speed" format but making the reverse happen is impossible from the client side because each record is different. - will -Original Message- From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 4:32 PM To: solr-user@l

Re: field display values

2007-05-25 Thread Ryan McKinley
Will Johnson wrote: Has anyone done anything interesting to preserve display values for field names. Ie my users would like to see Download Speed (MB/sec): 5 As opposed to: ds:5 The general model has been to think of solr like SQL... it is only the database - display choices should be