: want to add docs every 2 seconds all while doing queries. if I do
: commits every 2 seconds I basically loose any caching advantage and my
: faceting performance goes down the tube. If however, I were to add
: things to a smaller index and then roll it into the larger one every ~30
: minutes th
level federator
that can merge the large ~static index and the smaller more dynamic
index.
- will
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 10:53 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: fast update handlers
What about is
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: fast update handlers
On 5/10/07, Will Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I was more concerned with do
ge-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: fast update handlers
On 5/10/07, Will Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I was more concerned with doing the frequent
On 5/10/07, Will Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess I was more concerned with doing the frequent commits and how
that would affect the caches. Say I have 2M docs in my main index but I
want to add docs every 2 seconds all while doing queries. if I do
commits every 2 seconds I basically
assume computing the filter sets
for the smaller index should be fast enough even every 2 seconds.
- will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:49 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: fast
On 5/10/07, Will Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to setup a system to have very low index latency (1-2
seconds) and one of the javadocs intrigued me:
"DirectUpdateHandler2 implements an UpdateHandler where documents are
added directly to the main Lucene index as opposed to adding t
