EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:11 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: copyField limitation
: But, the directive in the schema has a limitation. It
will
only
: copy data between fields with the same type. If the two fields are a
: different type, the copy is ignore
Solr does not now do this. I don't know if the Solr processing stack has
this flexibility, or if it is worth adding it.
I understand every example you have suggested -- i just don't get how it
isn't possible. Can you post an exampe of the schema+commands that give
you an error?
If your go
: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:11 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: copyField limitation
: But, the directive in the schema has a limitation. It will
only
: copy data between fields with the same type. If the two fields are a
: different type, the copy is ignored. This example would req
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-464
Thanks for your time,
Lance Norskog
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:53 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: copyField limitation
On Jan 17, 2008 4:53 PM
: But, the directive in the schema has a limitation. It will only
: copy data between fields with the same type. If the two fields are a
: different type, the copy is ignored. This example would require
: to translate 'sint' to 'integer'.
i can't reproduce this problem. with the following add
On Jan 17, 2008 4:53 PM, Lance Norskog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because sort works much faster on type 'integer', but range queries do not
> work on type 'integer',
Really? The sort speed should be identical.
-Yonik
But, the directive in the schema has a limitation. It will only
copy data between fields with the same type. If the two fields are a
different type, the copy is ignored. This example would require
to translate 'sint' to 'integer'.
really? what version are you running? what error do you ge
