I am using the default on single node, which is frequency.
On the Wiki it says: In case of a distributed request to the
SpellCheckComponent, the shards are requested for at least five suggestions
even if the spellcheck.count parameter value is less than five. Once the
suggestions are collected, th
Hi O. Klein,
How you sorted the suggestion on frequency? I think, You
used freq to sort suggestions of
frequency. Are you using sharding/multiple servers in Solr because on
single node, comparatorClass is working but on multiple servers, it is not
working. Please assist me how to
Hi O. Klein,
How you sorted the suggestion on frequency? I think, You
used freq to sort suggestions of
frequency. Are you using sharding/multiple servers in Solr because on single
node, comparatorClass is working but on multiple servers, it is not working.
Please assist me how t
: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 3:25 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: alternativeTermCount and WordBreakSolrSpellChecker combination not
working
Yeah that should work. Is this something you will change in the code?
--
View this message
Yeah that should work. Is this something you will change in the code?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/alternativeTermCount-and-WordBreakSolrSpellChecker-combination-not-working-tp4185352p4185489.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
ruary 10, 2015 1:27 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: alternativeTermCount and WordBreakSolrSpellChecker combination not
working
I did some testing and the order of dictionaries doesn't seem to have an
effect. They are sorted by frequency. So if mm was applied "holy woo
I did some testing and the order of dictionaries doesn't seem to have an
effect. They are sorted by frequency. So if mm was applied "holy wood" would
have a lower frequency and solve this problem.
"suggestions":[
"holywood",{
"numFound":4,
"startOffset":0,
"endOffse
as testing the
possibilities is expensive.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 11:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: alternativeTermCount and WordBreakSolrSpellChecker combination not
wor
James,
That is very useful information. I tested it and can confirm that disabling
spellcheck in warmer solves core reload problem.
Now with my use case I'm not trying to spellcheck and correct a whitespace.
If "holy wood" was queried with a mm of 100% it would have fewer hits then
hollywood and
rves
no purpose but to make searchers take longer to open.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: alternativeTermCount and WordBreakSolrSpellChe
Thank you for that answer James.
Increasing spellcheck.count did the trick.
Funny result for query "holywood" the suggestion is "holy wood" instead of
"hollywood". Eventhough I have a mm of 100%.
Any way to fix that?
BTW when using maxCollationTries Solr hangs on core reload. Apparantly an
old
Okke,
My first guess is that the additional results from the word break spellchecker
is causing additional per-term results and the correct answer is not making the
list. So you might need to increase "spellcheck.count" and/or
"spellcheck.alternativeTermCount" .
My second guess is that the co
12 matches
Mail list logo
