Re: What's the need for copyField> when you have "fq"

2015-03-31 Thread Erick Erickson
Yet a third is that is often used when you want to treat the same data different ways. For instance, consider a "title" field. You might want to sort by title, but sorting on a tokenized field is undefined so I might use a copyField from "title" to "title_sort" and analyze the sort field with some

RE: What's the need for copyField> when you have "fq"

2015-03-31 Thread Toke Eskildsen
Steven White [swhite4...@gmail.com] wrote: > If I have 50 fields in a Solr doc and I index them without doing any > to a catch-all-field called "all_text". During search I use > "fq" to list all the 50 fields to search on. Now how different is this > from not using "fq" and searching against my