Re: Using ICUTokenizerFilter or StandardAnalyzer with UAX#29 support from Solr

2010-11-01 Thread Robert Muir
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Burton-West, Tom wrote: > Thanks Robert, > > I'll use the workaround for now (using StandardTokenizerFactory and > specifying version 3.1), but I suspect that I don't want the added URL/IP > address recognition due to my use case.  I've also talked to a couple peo

RE: Using ICUTokenizerFilter or StandardAnalyzer with UAX#29 support from Solr

2010-11-01 Thread Burton-West, Tom
es. (Unless someone beats me to it :) Tom -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:49 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Using ICUTokenizerFilter or StandardAnalyzer with UAX#29 support from Solr On Mon, Nov 1, 2010

Re: Using ICUTokenizerFilter or StandardAnalyzer with UAX#29 support from Solr

2010-11-01 Thread Robert Muir
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Burton-West, Tom wrote: > We are trying to solve some multilingual issues with our Solr analysis filter > chain and would like to use the new Lucene 3.x filters that are Unicode > compliant. > > Is it possible to use the Lucene ICUTokenizerFilter or StandardAnaly