are safer. Although a unit tests should guard against that as
>> well.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Markus
>>
>> ps, on this list there is normally no need to create a new thread for an
>> existing one, even if you are eagerly waiting for a reply. It might
ght take
> some patience though.
>
> -Original message-
> > From:Arnold Bronley
> > Sent: Thursday 5th September 2019 18:44
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: SolrClient from inside processAdd function
> >
> > Hi Markus,
> >
r an
existing one, even if you are eagerly waiting for a reply. It might take some
patience though.
-Original message-
> From:Arnold Bronley
> Sent: Thursday 5th September 2019 18:44
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SolrClient from inside processAdd function
&
regularly reload cores.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
>
>
> -Original message-
> > From:Arnold Bronley
> > Sent: Wednesday 4th September 2019 20:10
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: SolrClient from inside processAdd function
> >
e the client, it will cause trouble if you run unit tests,
and most certainly when you regularly reload cores.
Regards,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Arnold Bronley
> Sent: Wednesday 4th September 2019 20:10
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SolrC
Hi Simon,
I am interested in knowing what did you end up doing in your use-case then.
Can you please share it at least at high level?
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:26 PM Simon Rosenthal
wrote:
> Similarly, I had considered a URP which would call the Solr Tagger to add
> new metadata fields for inde
Similarly, I had considered a URP which would call the Solr Tagger to add
new metadata fields for indexing to incoming documents (and recall
discussing this with David Smiley), but eventually decided against this
approach on the grounds of complexity.
-Simon
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:10 PM Arnold
I need to search some other collection inside processAdd function and
append that information to the indexing request.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:55 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> This really sounds like an XY problem. What do you need the SolrClient
> _for_? I suspect there’s an easier way to do this
This really sounds like an XY problem. What do you need the SolrClient _for_? I
suspect there’s an easier way to do this…..
Best,
Erick
> On Sep 3, 2019, at 6:17 PM, Arnold Bronley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to create SolrClient from inside processAdd function for
> custom update proce
