On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 08:17 +0100, Sathya wrote:
> I am running single instance solr and the JVM heap space is minimum 6.3gb
> and maximum 24.31gb. Nothing is running to complete the 24gb except tomcat
> server. I have only 2 copyField entries only.
Your Xmx is the same size as your RAM. It shoul
Hi Shawn,
I am running single instance solr and the JVM heap space is minimum 6.3gb
and maximum 24.31gb. Nothing is running to complete the 24gb except tomcat
server. I have only 2 copyField entries only.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Shawn Heisey-4 [via Lucene] <
ml-node+s472066n4115455...@
On 2/4/2014 9:49 PM, Sathya wrote:
> Yes all the instances are reading the same 8GB data at a time. The java
> search programs(> 15 instances) are running in different machines, different
> JVM and they accessing the solr server machine(Ubuntu 64 bit). And the solr
> Index is not shard. The query r
Hi,
Yes all the instances are reading the same 8GB data at a time. The java
search programs(> 15 instances) are running in different machines, different
JVM and they accessing the solr server machine(Ubuntu 64 bit). And the solr
Index is not shard. The query rates are too poor(more than 5 seconds
You also said you have multiple instances (> 15) but are they all reading
the same 8Gb data (in which case it must be static or you'd get locking
problems) or is it partitioned/sharded somehow? I'd have the same
questions as the others, query rates, how are your queries distributed over
the instan
Maybe you need a larger Java heap.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Sathya
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 6:11 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Searching Issue
Hi Friends,
I am working in Solr 4.6.0 from last 2 months. i have indexed the data in
solr. Index
Hi;
Which JVM parameters do you use?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-02-04 Sathya :
> Hi Furkan,
>
> I have index the subjects that containing only 1 to 10 words per subject.
> And query rate is minimum 7 seconds for one searching. And i have single
> solr instance only.
>
>
>
> --
> View this mess
Hi Furkan,
I have index the subjects that containing only 1 to 10 words per subject.
And query rate is minimum 7 seconds for one searching. And i have single
solr instance only.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Searching-Issue-tp4115207p4115234.html
Sent
Hi;
Your index size is not much for a 24 GB machine. There should be any other
problem for it. What is your document size and query rate per second? On
the other hand how do you start up your Solr instance (which parameters do
you use)?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-02-04 Sathya :
> Hi Friends,
>
thanks ! I think I fixed the issue and it's doing good :)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Solr searching issue..
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:12:00 +
>
> Copy field dest="text&q
ROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Solr
> searching issue..> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:34:47 +0100> > > again whatever
> I have pasted it didn't work ! .. I have attached the schema.xml file
> instead
again whatever I have pasted it didn't work ! .. I have attached the schema.xml
file instead,,, sorry for spamming you all
thanks
ak
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Solr searching issue..
>
with some strange reason my copy and paste didn't work !!! sorry to terrible
you all.. hope you can see them now..
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Solr searching issue..
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 20
r-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr searching issue..
>
> You can use EdgeNGramTokenizer available with Solr 1.3 to achieve this. But
> I'd think again about introducing this kind of search as n-grams can bloat
> your index size.
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3
thanks,,
I will give it a try and get back to you
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:14:11 +0530
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr searching issue..
>
> You can use EdgeNGramTokenizer availabl
What was the type of the field that you are using. I guess you could achieve it
by a simple swap of text and string.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Solr
> searching issue..> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:28:50 +0100> > > Hi solr-users,
> > > version type: nigh
You can use EdgeNGramTokenizer available with Solr 1.3 to achieve this. But
I'd think again about introducing this kind of search as n-grams can bloat
your index size.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:58 PM, dudes dudes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi solr-users,
>
> version type: nightly build solr-2
17 matches
Mail list logo
