solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr Wildcard Search
At the very least the English possessive filter, which you have. Great!
Depending on what your query log analysis finds -- perhaps users are pretty
much only searching on nouns? -- you might consider
EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory.
ircumstances. Good luck finding the name "newing".
-Original Message-
From: Georgy Nevsky [mailto:gnevsky.cn...@thomasnet.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:31 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr Wildcard Search
I understand stemming reason. Thank you.
Wha
vember 30, 2017 8:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr Wildcard Search
The initial question wasn't about a phrasal search, but I largely agree that
diff q parsers handle the analysis chain differently for multiterms.
Yes, Porter is crazily aggressive. USE WITH CAUTION!
As
27;t find it. It would find "shippqrs"
because porter wouldn't know what to do with that 😊
Again, Porter can be very dangerous if it doesn't align with user expectations.
-Original Message-----
From: Atita Arora [mailto:atitaar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 3
ion parameters are default
> to
> Apache Solr 7.1.0.
>
> In the best we trust
> Georgy Nevsky
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Leir [mailto:rl...@leirtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:32 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject
ache Solr 7.1.0.
In the best we trust
Georgy Nevsky
-Original Message-
From: Rick Leir [mailto:rl...@leirtech.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Wildcard Search
George,
When you get those results it could be due to stemming.
George,
When you get those results it could be due to stemming.
Wildcard processing expands your term to multiple terms, OR'd together. It also
takes you down a different analysis pathway, as many analysis components do not
work with multiple terms. Look into the SolrAdmin console, and use the a
What do you want actual user queries to look like? I mean, having to
explicitly write asterisks after every term is a real pain.
Indexing ngrams has the advantage that phrase queries and edismax phrase
boosting work automatically. Phrases don't work with explicit wildcard
queries.
The only real d
Try it and see ;).
My experience is that wildcards work fine, although
what "fine" is up to you to decide _if_ you restrict
it to requiring at least two leading "real" characters,
and I actually prefer three. I.e.
ab* or abc*. Note that if you require leading
wildcards, use the reverse wildcard fi
On 6/27/2015 4:27 AM, octopus wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking at Solr's features for wildcard search used for a large
> amount of text. I read on the net that solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory is used
> to generate tokens for wildcard searching.
>
> For Nigerian => "ni", "nig", "nige", "niger", "nigeri", "nig
That is one way to implement wildcarda, but isnt the most efficient.
Just index normally, tokenized, and search with an asterisk suffix, e.g.
foo*
This will build a finite state transformer that will make wildcard
handling efficient.
Upayavira
On, Jun 27, 2015, at 11:27 AM, pus wrote:
> Hi, I'm
Also be aware that some analysis steps may not
be performed on wildcards. The filter has to be
MultTermAware. See:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultitermQueryAnalysis
and
http://searchhub.org/2011/11/29/whats-with-lowercasing-wildcard-multiterm-queries-in-solr/
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 a
Wildcard applies only to a single term. The escaped space suggests that you
are trying to match a wildcard on multiple terms.
Try the contrib complex phrase query parser.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Prasi S
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.
13 matches
Mail list logo
