Re: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-17 Thread Venkatraman S
C'est Parfait! .. yes - that was the problem. thanks a lot. I am compiling a complete list of FAQs - will update it in the wiki soon. -vEnKAt On 9/18/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : The corresponding entry for this field in schema.xml is : > : : stored="true" multiValued

Re: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-17 Thread Chris Hostetter
: The corresponding entry for this field in schema.xml is : : i'm guessing "text" is from the example schema.xml ... this is not a good type to use for a uniqueId field ... that alone might be causing some of your problems with replaceing docs ... try "string" : 2) Also, at the time of dele

Re: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-16 Thread Venkatraman S
Kindly Note again : we are using Embedded Solr. On 9/17/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Venkatraman S wrote: > > We are using Lucene and are migrating to Solr 1.2 (we are using Embedded > > Solr). During this process we are stumbling on certain problems : > > > > 1) IF the same do

Re: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-16 Thread Ryan McKinley
Venkatraman S wrote: We are using Lucene and are migrating to Solr 1.2 (we are using Embedded Solr). During this process we are stumbling on certain problems : 1) IF the same document is added again, then it it getting added in the index again(duplicated); inspite of the fact that the IDs are un

RE: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-16 Thread Stu Hood
With regards to #3, it is recommended that for faceting, you use a separate copy of the field with stemming/tokenizing disabled. See : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview#head-fc68926c8421055de872acc694a6a966fab705d6 Thanks, Stu -Original Message- From: Venkatraman S Sent