Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-18 Thread Erick Erickson
Hmmm. What do you get when you use ?debugQuery=true? Have you gone in through the SOLR admin page and tries queries that way? what do you see? Puzzles me too Erick On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:52 AM, QBasti wrote: > > Thanks for hanging in there and helping me > > when wildcard-queries aren't

Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-18 Thread QBasti
Thanks for hanging in there and helping me when wildcard-queries aren't analysed it makes sense for this one. But i'm still stuck at the problem mentioned above with "AndererName09". I'm not using any wildcards, the query-string and the index-value clearly show - a lot of - matches but still I g

Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-17 Thread Erick Erickson
I think your problem is WordDelimiterFilterFactory. For reference, see: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory As I understand it, your input name01 get

Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-17 Thread QBasti
Hey there, I put the complete configuration for the "text"-type fields (this field is a "text"-type) at the bottom. but now it got me totally confused. i switched off the WordDelimiterFactory and the index value is: "Herrn AndererName09 NochmalName09", which is getting analysed into: "herrn|ander

Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-14 Thread Erick Erickson
Still not enough information. Please post the exact definition of your analyzers from your schema file. But I'm 90% sure your WordDelimterFactory is the problem, it's probably splitting our input on letter-> number transitions. Please see the page I referenced above. Best Erick On Mon, Dec 14, 2

Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-14 Thread QBasti
But then, how can I search for a name, when i don't know the exact number, i only know "name" and the number begins with "0", so what expression instead of "nam0*" would i have to use and why cant I use the wildcard expression? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildca

Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-12 Thread QBasti
Hey, thanks for the help Need analyzer definitions BOTH for indexing and querying, the correlation between the two is important./quote> The Query Analyzers are: LowerCaseFilterFactory RemoveDuplicatesFilterFactory WordDelimiterFilterFactory StopFilterFactory and SynonymFilterFactory So it say

Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-11 Thread Erick Erickson
Nothing came through showing the filters Need analyzer definitions BOTH for indexing and querying, the correlation between the two is important. Storing and indexing are orthogonal. When you *index* a field, you are putting the tokens that come from the input stream into the inverted index, p

Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-11 Thread QBasti
Hey, well, the field is stored as well as indexed, and these are the filters that are used while indexing: W -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildcard-Search-Question-tp26747482p26748588.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-11 Thread Erick Erickson
In addition to Ankit's comments, SOLR manipulates the input for each field according to the rules that govern the tokenizers and filters that you define in your schema. This page is very valuable, although it takes a while to get comfortable with it... http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokeniz

RE: Simple Wildcard Search Question

2009-12-11 Thread Ankit Bhatnagar
Firstly wild card queries are not analysed by Solr. Also there is a difference between stored and indexed fields. Ankit -Original Message- From: QBasti [mailto:sebastian.f...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 11:40 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Simple Wildcard Se