Okay, I will do so in future, if another problem like this occurs.
At the moment, everything is fine after I followed your suggestions.
Kind regards
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Short-DismaxRequestHandler-Question-tp775913p820355.html
Sent from th
: I got a fundamental understanding question that Mike's posting did not
: answer:
: You say "q=apple iPhone & qf=title^5 manufacturer & mm=100%" is correct.
: That means:
: title: "iphone" -> matches "iphone" but not "apple"
: manufacturer: "apple" -> matches "apple" but not "iphone"
: According
Thank you for the explanation, Hoss.
At the moment, I am not able to try out Solr, because I am going to write my
exam from tomorrow to Wednesday.
This is because I would try out as much as possible and dive into some
sourcecode and this would be no good idea in this context. So my questions
are
: The StopWordFilter (my implementation) removes specific types of words *and*
: all markers from all words.
:
: This leads to a deletion of some parts of sentences.
Ah, yes i think you're running into the same confusion people have with
dismax and stopwords -- there was a blog about this recen
Btw: This thread helps a lot to understand the difference between qf and pf
:-)
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Dismax-query-phrases-td489994.html#a489995
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Short-DismaxRequestHandler-Question-tp775913p783379.html
Sent from the
Okay, let me be more specific:
I got a custom StopWordFilter and a WordMarkingFilter.
The WordMarkingFilter is an easy implementation to determine which type a
word is.
The StopWordFilter (my implementation) removes specific types of words *and*
all markers from all words.
This leads to a delet
: I need a minimum should match only on some fields, not on all.
You need to elaborate more on how you want things to work -- you've only
provided one example doc and one example quer, and indicated that you want
them to match -- you haven't explained:
a) what docs should *not* match the quer
You may create a new field by copying the fields title, category and tag to the
new field, like the following:
and search against the new field. You may go for newField of type "textgen".
Give it a try,
Naga
From: MitchK [mitc...@web.de]
Sent: Tuesda
I got an idea:
If I would catenate all relevant fields to one large multiValued field, I
could query like this:
{!dismax qf='myLargeField^5'}solr development //mm is 1 (100%) if not set
Additionally to that, I add a phraseQuery
{!dismax qf='myLargeField^5'}solr development AND title:(solr
develo
Thank you for responsing.
This would be possible. However, I wouldn't like to do so, because a match
in "title" should boost higher than a match in "category".
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Short-DismaxRequestHandler-Question-tp775913p776238.html
Sent fr
I think you could combine the minimum set of fields into one field at
the time of indexing, for example, you could concatenate 'category' and
'tag' at the time of querying (if you are using a database).
On 05/04/2010 09:06 AM, MitchK wrote:
Hello community,
I need a minimum should match only on
11 matches
Mail list logo
