On 11/23/2016 11:27 AM, Prateek Jain J wrote:
> 1. Solr is indexing engine but it stores both data and indexes in same
> directory. Although we can select fields to store/persist in solr via
> schema.xml. But in nutshell, it's not possible to distinguish between data
> and indexes like, I
uild database.
>
> Regards,
> Prateek Jain
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
> Sent: 24 November 2016 05:14 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
>
> Sure. Someone sends an HTTP re
...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: 24 November 2016 05:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
Sure. Someone sends an HTTP request that deletes all the content. I’m glad to
share the curl request.
Or you can put content in with fields that are indexed but not stored. Then the
content is “gone
]
Sent: 24 November 2016 12:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
Well, I didn’t actually recommend MongoDB as a repository. :-)
If you want transactions and search, buy MarkLogic. I worked there for two
years, and that is serious non-muggle technology.
wunder
Walter
a detailed scenario where solr content could
>> "disappear"?
>>
>> Disappear means what exactly?
>>
>> TIA,
>> Kris
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
>> S
.@wunderwood.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 7:47 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
>
> Well, I didn’t actually recommend MongoDB as a repository. :-)
>
> If you want transactions and search, buy MarkLogic. I worked there for two
&g
rg
Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
Well, I didn’t actually recommend MongoDB as a repository. :-)
If you want transactions and search, buy MarkLogic. I worked there for two
years, and that is serious non-muggle technology.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
x.
>>>
>>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24 November 2016 at 07:34, Prateek Jain J
>>> wrote:
>>>> SOLR also supports, schemaless behaviour. and my question is same that,
estion is same that, why
>>> and where should we prefer mongodb. Web search didn’t helped me on this.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Prateek Jain
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Rohit Kanchan [mailto:rohitkan2...@gma
ek Jain
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Rohit Kanchan [mailto:rohitkan2...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 23 November 2016 07:07 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
>>
>> Hi Prateek,
>>
>> I think you
elped me on this.
>
>
> Regards,
> Prateek Jain
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Kanchan [mailto:rohitkan2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 23 November 2016 07:07 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
>
> Hi Prateek,
>
> I th
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
Hi Prateek,
I think you are talking about two different animals. Solr(actually embedded
lucene) is actually a search engine where you can use different features like
faceting, highlighting etc but it is a document store where for each text it
does
Hi Prateek,
I think you are talking about two different animals. Solr(actually embedded
lucene) is actually a search engine where you can use different features
like faceting, highlighting etc but it is a document store where for each
text it does create an Inverted index and map that to documents
13 matches
Mail list logo
