14:56
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question concerning the updating of my solr index
Greg,
I believe the point of SUSS is that you can just add docs to it one by one, so
that SUSS can asynchronously send them to the backend Solr instead of you
batching the docs.
Otis
-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Greg Georges
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 2:45:40 PM
> Subject: RE: Question concerning the updating of my solr index
>
> Oops, here is the code
>
> SolrServer server = new
>Stream
ver.commit();
server.optimize();
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Greg Georges [mailto:greg.geor...@biztree.com]
Sent: 2 mai 2011 14:44
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Question concerning the updating of my solr index
Ok I had seen this in the wiki, performance has go
Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 2 mai 2011 13:59
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question concerning the updating of my solr index
Greg,
You could use StreamingUpdateSolrServer instead of that UpdateRequest class -
http://search-lucene.com/?q=StreamingUpdateSolrServer
Greg,
You could use StreamingUpdateSolrServer instead of that UpdateRequest class -
http://search-lucene.com/?q=StreamingUpdateSolrServer+&fc_project=Solr
Your index won't be locked in the sense that you could have multiple apps or
threads adding docs to the same index simultaneously and that se