Hi,
Indeed, with character # encoded the query works fine.
Thanks
--
Yago Riveiro
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 at 9:43 PM, bbarani wrote:
> # has a separate meaning in URL.. You need to encode that..
>
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6
# has a separate meaning in URL.. You need to encode that..
http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_0/queryparsersyntax.html#Escaping%20Special%20Characters.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-syntax-error-Cannot-parse-tp4066560p4066879.html
Sent from the Solr
Hi,
Try to pass URL encode value(%23) for # .
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-syntax-error-Cannot-parse-tp4066560p4066566.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
When you put a backslash in a Java string you need to escape it with another
backslash:
"content:\\?\\?\\?\\?\\?\\?"
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Aristov
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 8:30 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: query synt
On 12 July 2012 19:28, Michael Della Bitta
wrote:
> Perhaps they're being displayed as question marks, but the actual
> character is different?
This is very likely to be the case, as messing up the encoding can
leave one with entirely unexpected characters. The '?' probably
corresponds to a non-d
Perhaps they're being displayed as question marks, but the actual
character is different?
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions, Inc. -- Where Influence Isn’t a Game.
http://www.appinions.com
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Alexander Aristov
wrote:
> d
don't know why but doesn't work. :(
Best Regards
Alexander Aristov
On 11 July 2012 23:54, Yury Kats wrote:
> On 7/11/2012 2:55 PM, Alexander Aristov wrote:
>
> > content:?? doesn't work :)
>
> I would try escaping them: content:\?\?\?\?\?\?
>
>
>
>
On 7/11/2012 2:55 PM, Alexander Aristov wrote:
> content:?? doesn't work :)
I would try escaping them: content:\?\?\?\?\?\?
match any of these 23243455 , 245, 3457676 .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 5:43 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; cra...@ceiindia.com
> Subject: Re: Query syntax
>
M
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; cra...@ceiindia.com
Subject: Re: Query syntax
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Radha C. wrote:
I need to search the multiple values from the same field. I am having the
following syntax
I am thinking of the first option. Can anyone tell me which one is corr
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Radha C. wrote:
> I need to search the multiple values from the same field. I am having the
> following syntax
>
> I am thinking of the first option. Can anyone tell me which one is correct
> syntax?
>
> Q=+title:=test +site_id:="22 3000676 566644"
>
> Q=+ti
It is the fraction of the score non-max terms that get added to the
solr. Hence, 1.0=sum everythign.
-Mike
On 4-Jan-08, at 3:28 PM, anuvenk wrote:
Could you elaborate on what the tie param does? I did read the
definition in
the solr wiki but still not crystal clear.
Mike Klaas wrote:
Could you elaborate on what the tie param does? I did read the definition in
the solr wiki but still not crystal clear.
Mike Klaas wrote:
>
>
> On 4-Jan-08, at 1:12 PM, s d wrote:
>
>> but i want to sum the scores and not use max, can i still do it
>> with the
>> DisMax? am i missing anythin
On 4-Jan-08, at 1:12 PM, s d wrote:
but i want to sum the scores and not use max, can i still do it
with the
DisMax? am i missing anything ?
If you set tie=1.0, dismax functions like dissum.
-Mike
but i want to sum the scores and not use max, can i still do it with the
DisMax? am i missing anything ?
On Jan 4, 2008 2:32 AM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2008, at 4:40 AM, s d wrote:
> > Is there a simpler way to write this query (I'm using the standard
> > handler)
>
On Jan 4, 2008, at 4:40 AM, s d wrote:
Is there a simpler way to write this query (I'm using the standard
handler)
?
field1:t1 field1:t2 field1:"t1 t2" field2:t1 field2:t2 field2:"t1 t2"
Looks like you'd be better off using the DisMax handler for
(without the brackets).
Erik
So you think my problem is caused by different index/query data
analysis? i'll check it. thank you
On Nov 6, 2007 6:02 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/6/07, Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have in index document with field "name" and its value is
> > "somename12
On 11/6/07, Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have in index document with field "name" and its value is
> "somename123"
> Why I can't find anything with query
> name:somename123*
This is a prefix query. No analysis is done on the prefix, so it may
not match analy
On 10/11/07, BrendanD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a difference in the performance for the following 2 variations on
> query syntax? The first query was a response from Solr by using a single fq
> parameter in the URL. The second query was a response from Solr by using
> separate fq parame
: The query is against a schema that stores the user_ids who have worked on each
: document in a multi-value integer field called 'user_ids'. I'd like to query
: solr for all documents that anyone other than a few users have worked on.
:
: For instance, say the user group I'm working with is use
:
: I have the following Query:
: q=field1:tag1 tag2^0.5 OR field2:tag1
: tag2^0.5&version=2.2&start=0&rows=170&indent=on&fl=*,score
:
: And i want to do :
: 1. Return back ONLY documents that contain both tag1 AND tag2 in
: field1. when i try using Lucene syntax (+tag1 or +(tag1)) i get an
: excep
21 matches
Mail list logo
