fied problem of cross-lingual
retrieval in Lucene. Sorry if it is not as clear as I would like (English is
not my mother tongue).
Nicolas
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Yonik Seeley
Envoyé : dimanche 2 mars 2008 03:45
À : solr-u
PROTECTED]
Envoyé : samedi 1 mars 2008 13:54
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Proposition of a new feature: Dynamic Field Types
How many languages are you dealing with? How are you generating your
queries? Are you taking your source language and translating it to
each of the lang
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't quite follow everything here (examples?), but I believe IDF of a term
> is not a per-field value, but "index-wide".
I think Nicolas meant that idfs are field specific, and that is the
case (index-wide, per field
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 11:52:07 AM
> Subject: RE: Proposition of a new feature: Dynamic Field Types
>
> Thanks for your response Grant.
>
> You are right, depending of the
ested!
Nicolas
-Message d'origine-
De : Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 29 février 2008 14:06
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Proposition of a new feature: Dynamic Field Types
Why can't you choose the proper field in your application and keep
sep
-Message d'origine-
De : Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 29 février 2008 14:06
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Proposition of a new feature: Dynamic Field Types
Why can't you choose the proper field in your application and keep
separate field
Why can't you choose the proper field in your application and keep
separate fields per language? Putting them all in the same field,
regardless of language, is not a good idea in my opinion because it is
more than likely going to skew your statistics and lower your relevance.
That being sa
