edismax did the trick! Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-tokenization-that-finds-part-of-stringvalue-tp3785366p3805045.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> @iorixxx: Sorry it took so long, had
> some difficulties upgrading to 3.5.0
>
> It still doesnt work. Here's what I have now:
>
> I copied text_general_rev from
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/example/solr/conf/schema.xml
> to my schema.xml:
> class="solr.TextField"
@iorixxx: Sorry it took so long, had some difficulties upgrading to 3.5.0
It still doesnt work. Here's what I have now:
I copied text_general_rev from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/example/solr/conf/schema.xml
to my schema.xml:
> @iorixxx
> I tried making my title_search of type text_rev and tried
> adding the
> ReversedWildcardFilterFactory to my existing "text" type,
> but in both cases
> no luck.
I was able to perform *query* types of searches with solr 3.5 distro.
Here is what I did:
Download apache-solr-3.5.0
Edit
@iorixxx
I tried making my title_search of type text_rev and tried adding the
ReversedWildcardFilterFactory to my existing "text" type, but in both cases
no luck.
@Erick Erickson
"On frequent method of doing leading and trailing wildcards is to use ngrams
(as distinct from edgengrams). That in com
> @iorixxx: Where can I find that
> example schema.xml?
Please find text_general_rev at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/example/solr/conf/schema.xml
> And when I find it, can I just make the title field which
> currently is of
> "text" type then of "text_rev" type?
Yes,
On frequent method of doing leading and trailing wildcards
is to use ngrams (as distinct from edgengrams). That in
combination with phrase queries might work well in this case.
You also might be surprised at how little space bigrams take,
give it a test and see ..
Best
Erick
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012
@iorixxx: Where can I find that example schema.xml?
I downloaded the latest version here:
ftp://apache.mirror.easycolocate.nl//lucene/solr/3.5.0
And checked \example\example-DIH\solr\db\conf\schema.xml
But no text_rev type is defined in there.
And when I find it, can I just make the title field w
--- On Thu, 3/1/12, PeterKerk wrote:
> From: PeterKerk
> Subject: Re: Need tokenization that finds part of stringvalue
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, March 1, 2012, 6:59 PM
> @iorixxx: yes, that is what I need.
> But also when its IN the text, not
&g
@iorixxx: yes, that is what I need. But also when its IN the text, not
necessarily at the beginning.
So using the * character like:
q=smart*
the product is found, but when I do this:
q=*mart*
it isnt...why is that?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-toke
> if title holds "smartphone" I want it to be found when
> someone types
> "martph" or "smar" or "smart".
Peter, so you want to beginsWith startsWith type of search? You can use use
wildcard search (with start operator) for this. e.g. &q=smar*
Alternatively, if your index size is not huge, you
[mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Need tokenization that finds part of stringvalue
I once used a spell checker to break up compound words. It was slow, but worked
pretty well.
wunder
On Mar 1, 2012, at 5:53 AM,
I once used a spell checker to break up compound words. It was slow, but worked
pretty well.
wunder
On Mar 1, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Right, there's nothing in Solr that I know of that'll help here. How would
> a tokenizer understand that "smartphone" should be "smart" "phone"
I think I didnt explain myself clearly: I need to be able to find substrings.
So, its not that I'd expect Solr to find synonyms, but rather if a piece of
text contains the searched text, for example:
if title holds "smartphone" I want it to be found when someone types
"martph" or "smar" or "smart"
Right, there's nothing in Solr that I know of that'll help here. How would
a tokenizer understand that "smartphone" should be "smart" "phone"?
There's no general solution for this issue.
You can do domain-specific solutions with synonyms for instance, or
some other word list that contains terms yo
15 matches
Mail list logo
