RE: NFS Stale handle in a distributed SOLR deployment

2007-09-13 Thread Kasi Sankaralingam
Thanks, I ran into the problem when I issued the commit command to the SOLR search server. -Original Message- From: J.J. Larrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:29 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: NFS Stale handle in a distributed SOLR

Re: NFS Stale handle in a distributed SOLR deployment

2007-09-13 Thread J.J. Larrea
Sometimes one has to make things work in the environment one is handed (e.g. virtualized servers, ALL storage resources resident on a SAN and accessed via NFS, read-only mounts on the deployment instances with only the production indexers having write access). While I agree that fast local inde

Re: NFS Stale handle in a distributed SOLR deployment

2007-09-13 Thread Walter Underwood
The straightforward solution is to not put your indexes on NFS. It is slow and it causes failures like this. I'm serious about that. I've seen several different search engines (not just Solr/Lucene) get very slow and unreliable when the indexes were on NFS. wunder On 9/13/07 10:59 AM, "Kasi Sank