Re: Multiple custom Similarity implementations

2016-03-10 Thread Parvesh Garg
Hi Ahmet, Thanks for the pointer. I have similar thoughts on the subject. The risk assumptions are based on not testing your stuff before taking it in. That risk is still valid with similarity configuration. And sometimes, it may not be possible to use multiple similarities (custom or otherwise).

Re: Multiple custom Similarity implementations

2016-03-10 Thread Ahmet Arslan
Hi Parvesh, Please see the similar discussion : http://search-lucene.com/m/eHNlijx91I7etm1 Ahmet On Thursday, March 10, 2016 6:57 AM, Parvesh Garg wrote: Thanks Markus. We will look at other options. May I ask what can be the reasons for not supporting this ever? Parvesh Garg, http://www

Re: Multiple custom Similarity implementations

2016-03-09 Thread Parvesh Garg
Thanks Markus. We will look at other options. May I ask what can be the reasons for not supporting this ever? Parvesh Garg, http://www.zettata.com On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > Hello, you can not change similarities per request, and this is likely > never going to be

RE: Multiple custom Similarity implementations

2016-03-08 Thread Markus Jelsma
Hello, you can not change similarities per request, and this is likely never going to be supported for good reasons. You need multiple cores, or multiple fields with different similarity defined in the same core. Markus -Original message- > From:Parvesh Garg > Sent: Tuesday 8th March 2