;s to the embedded server would lead to a OOM error. I
> should probably look into the other options.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 3:58 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.or
y facility to unpack this into the actual text? Or must I execute
> that in the SQL query?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Smiley, David W. [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:45 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject
SQL query?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Smiley, David W. [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:45 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving From Oracle Text Search To Solr
If you do stay with Oracle, please report back to the list how that went. In
or
; -Original Message-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 3:58 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving From Oracle Text Search To Solr
>
> Why do you think you'd hit OOM errors? How big is "
I've also index a concatenation of 50k journal articles (making a
single document of several hundred MB of text) and it did not give me
an OOM.
-glen
On 16 March 2010 15:57, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Why do you think you'd hit OOM errors? How big is "very large"? I've
> indexed, as a single docum
ptions.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 3:58 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving From Oracle Text Search To Solr
Why do you think you'd hit OOM errors? How big is "very large&qu
Why do you think you'd hit OOM errors? How big is "very large"? I've
indexed, as a single document, a 26 volume encyclopedia of civil war
records..
Although as much as I like the technology, if I could get away without using
two technologies, I would. Are you completely sure you can't get what
