On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Stephen Green wrote:
> Otis pointed out that the patch can't be applied against the current
> source, so I need to go back and make it work with the current source
> (new job = no time). I'll see if I can find the time this weekend to
> do this.
OK, I just submit
Here's the problem with what you're outlining:
Solr/Lucene doc ids are NOT invariant, so
the doc IDs you get from "the other system"
will not be directly usable by in the filter. But
assuming the other system stores what you've
defined as you could walk the
index and get the doc IDs from that (See
Good point - though the inverse could be true where only a few documents is
allowed and then a big list still exists. Even in the middle ground, its still
going to be a long list of thousands.
Thanks
Mike
> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:58:33 +
> Subject: Re: Lower level filtering
That was a quick response Steve!
Sounds all great! Much appreciated. Definitely think specifying a bit filter is
something that many people many find useful.
I'll have a look at Solr-2052 too.
Thanks again,
Mike
> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:57:54 -0500
> Subject: Re: Lower leve
It might not be practical in your case, but is it possible to get from that
other system, a list of ids the user is *not* allow to see and somehow
invert the logic in the filter?
Regards,
-- Savvas.
On 15 December 2010 14:49, Michael Owen wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm currently using Solr and I've g
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Michael Owen wrote:
> I'm currently using Solr and I've got a question about filtering on a lower
> level than filter queries.
> We want to be able to restrict the documents that can possibly be returned to
> a users query. From another system we'll get a list of
