Yup, known stuff, on TODO.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/
Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> Interesting. It seems to spend more time in GC, but the major GCs aren't any
> faster. They are
Interesting. It seems to spend more time in GC, but the major GCs aren't any
faster. They are more consistent.
I notice that SPM shows average collection time. This is not a particularly
useful number. It should use median and percentiles.
For a one-sided distribution, never use mean (average),
And here is our most recent experience with G1, although not with
Solr, but with HBase:
http://blog.sematext.com/2013/06/24/g1-cms-java-garbage-collector/
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/
Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:3
On 6/20/2013 10:22 PM, William Bell wrote:
> It would be good to see some CMS configs too... Can you send your java
> params?
Here is what we use in production. We run multiple collections with small
documents. One is 3M docs, one is 9M, one is 2M, and the other three are
small. We use Amazon m
On 6/20/2013 10:22 PM, William Bell wrote:
> It would be good to see some CMS configs too... Can you send your java
> params?
I've got it documented on my personal wiki page:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ShawnHeisey#GC_Tuning
Thanks,
Shawn
Hi Shawn,
some good information about G1 tuning, may be something for the wiki about GC
tuning.
Am 20.06.2013 18:01, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
> On 6/20/2013 8:02 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> ...
> ... When you take a look at the overall stats and the memory graph over time,
> G1 looks way better.
> U
It would be good to see some CMS configs too... Can you send your java
params?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/19/2013 4:18 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > I'm sure there's some site to do this but wanted to get a feel for
> > who's running Solr 4 on Java 7 with G1 gc
ilto:thelabd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 9:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Informal poll on running Solr 4 on Java 7 with G1GC
Awesome info, thanks Shawn! I'll post back my results with G1 after we've had
some time to analyze it in production.
On T
Awesome info, thanks Shawn! I'll post back my results with G1 after
we've had some time to analyze it in production.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/20/2013 8:02 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> We used to use G1, but recently went back to CMS.
>>
>> G1 gave us too long
On 6/20/2013 8:02 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
We used to use G1, but recently went back to CMS.
G1 gave us too long stop-the-world events. CMS uses more ressources for
the same work, but it is more predictable and we get better worst-case
performance out of it.
This is exactly the behavior I saw.
We used to use G1, but recently went
back to CMS.
G1 gave us too long stop-the-world events. CMS uses more
ressources for the same work, but it is more predictable and we
get better worst-case performance out of it.
Med venlig h
Am 20.06.2013 00:18, schrieb Timothy Potter:
> I'm sure there's some site to do this but wanted to get a feel for
> who's running Solr 4 on Java 7 with G1 gc enabled?
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>
Currently using Solr 4.2.1 in production with Oracle Java(TM) SE Runtime
Environment (build 1.7.0_07-b10)
an
On 6/19/2013 4:18 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> I'm sure there's some site to do this but wanted to get a feel for
> who's running Solr 4 on Java 7 with G1 gc enabled?
I have tried it, but found that G1 didn't give me any better GC pause
characteristics than CMS without tuning, and may have actually
13 matches
Mail list logo
