RE: IndexableBinaryStringTools (was FieldCache)

2010-11-13 Thread Steven A Rowe
On 11/13/2010 at 2:04 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: n Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > > Looks to me like the returned value is in a Solr-internal form of XML > > character escaping: \u is represented as "#0;" and \u0008 is > > represented as "#8;".  (The escaping code is in > >

Re: IndexableBinaryStringTools (was FieldCache)

2010-11-13 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > Looks to me like the returned value is in a Solr-internal form of XML > character escaping: \u is represented as "#0;" and \u0008 is represented > as "#8;".  (The escaping code is in > solr/src/java/org/apache/common/util/XML.java.) Y

RE: IndexableBinaryStringTools (was FieldCache)

2010-11-13 Thread Steven A Rowe
Hi Mathias, > > > I assume that the char[] returned form > > > IndexableBinaryStringTools.encode is encoded in UTF-8 again > > > and then stored. At some point the information is lost and > > > cannot be recovered. > > > > Can you give an example? This should not happen. > > My character array r