On 8/21/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : I'm wondering what's the best way to completely change a big index
> : without loosing any requests.
>
> use the snapinstaller script -- or adopt the same atomic copying approach
> it uses.
I'm having a look :)
> : - Between the two
: I'm wondering what's the best way to completely change a big index
: without loosing any requests.
use the snapinstaller script -- or adopt the same atomic copying approach
it uses.
: - Between the two mv's, the directory dir does not exists, which can
: cause some solr failure.
this shoul
I guess the first question is why you have to swap in a big index, instead of
rsyc'ng or another method. I've entertained the idea of putting a load
balancer in front of two solr instances. In this scenario take one off-line
swap in the index, bring it back on and then bring down the other. N
