Thanks for the pointer.
Please advise me how I can contribute.
H
> On Jan 27, 2016, at 2:16 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
>
> Erick Erickson wrote:
>> DocValues was designed to support unanalyzed types
>> originally. I don't know that code, but given my respect
>> for the people who wrote I'd be
RE: separating a column into two for different behavior.
Yes, that is exactly I was advised multiple time. However, it will make a
problem when I apply it to my application.
I have a one core that contains more than 50 columns (out of 100) want to be
searched by case-insensitive and partial matc
Hello Harry ,
sorry for delayed reply , I have taken other approach by giving user a
different usability as I did not have solution for this. But your option
looks great , I will try this out.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-use-DocValues-with-TextFie
Erick Erickson wrote:
> DocValues was designed to support unanalyzed types
> originally. I don't know that code, but given my respect
> for the people who wrote I'd be amazed if there weren't
> very good reasons this is true. I suspect your work-around
> is going to be "surprising".
Hoss talked a
DocValues was designed to support unanalyzed types
originally. I don't know that code, but given my respect
for the people who wrote I'd be amazed if there weren't
very good reasons this is true. I suspect your work-around
is going to be "surprising".
And have you tested your change at scale? I su
Hi, I actually needed this functionality for a long time and I made up an
extended data type to work around.
In my use case, I need a case-insensitive search for a relatively short string
and at the same time, I need faceting on the original string. For example,
“Human, Home sapiens’ is an ori
Thanks Markus.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-use-DocValues-with-TextField-tp4248647p4248797.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Erick.
Yes I was not clear in questioning but I want it to be searchable on
TextField.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-use-DocValues-with-TextField-tp4248647p4248796.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Assuming (and it wasn't clear from your problem statement) that you need
to search tokens in your field, this approach should be fine. I think Markus'
comment was assuming that you did _not_ need to search the
field. If you do, a copyField seems best.
Do be aware, though, that this will make for a
Hello - indeed, this is not going to work. But since you are using the token
filter as some preprocessor, you could easily use an update request processor
to do the preprocessing work for you. Check out the documentation, i think you
can use the RegexReplaceProcessor.
https://cwiki.apache.org/c
10 matches
Mail list logo
