RE: How to store a dense field value efficiently

2010-01-22 Thread Dallan Quass
Sorry - I meant indexed. I don't store the fields. --dallan > -Original Message- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 9:30 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: How to store a dense field value e

Re: How to store a dense field value efficiently

2010-01-22 Thread Erick Erickson
Oops, that's a Lucene bit (got confused which list I was on). You can still control storing the raw text in SOLR, so my question is still relevant, but the solution may be different. Do you store the fields? Erick On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > I'm surprised by a 30%

Re: How to store a dense field value efficiently

2010-01-22 Thread Erick Erickson
I'm surprised by a 30% increase. The approach of adding a special token for "not present" is one of the standard ones So just to check, when you say "stored", are you really storing the missing value? As in Field.Store.YES? As opposed to Field.Index.###? Because theres no need to Store this va