> > Sent: Wednesday 5th September 2018 18:32
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Heap Memory Problem after Upgrading to 7.4.0
> >
> > I think this is pretty bad. I created
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12743. Feel free to add an
Thanks Tomás!
Björn, can you reproduce the problem in a local and controlled environment?
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Sent: Wednesday 5th September 2018 18:32
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Heap Memory Problem after Upgrad
message-
> > From:Björn Häuser
> > Sent: Monday 3rd September 2018 22:28
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Heap Memory Problem after Upgrading to 7.4.0
> >
> > Hi Markus,
> >
> > this reads exactly like what we
.
Hope it helps,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Björn Häuser
> Sent: Monday 3rd September 2018 22:28
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Heap Memory Problem after Upgrading to 7.4.0
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> this reads exactly like what we have. Wher
ince you shortly after 7.3.0 upgraded to 7.4.0, can you confirm
>> the problem is not also in 7.3.0?
>>
>> You should see the instance count for IndexSearcher increase by one for each
>> replica on each commit.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Markus
>>
>>
s
Björn
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
> [1] http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/RE-7-3-appears-to-leak-td4396232.html
>
>
>
> -Original message-
>> From:Erick Erickson
>> Sent: Monday 3rd September 2018 20:49
>> To: solr-user
>> Sub
s not also in 7.3.0?
>
> You should see the instance count for IndexSearcher increase by one for each
> replica on each commit.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
> [1] http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/RE-7-3-appears-to-leak-td4396232.html
>
>
>
> -----Original message--
ach
replica on each commit.
Regards,
Markus
[1] http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/RE-7-3-appears-to-leak-td4396232.html
-Original message-
> From:Erick Erickson
> Sent: Monday 3rd September 2018 20:49
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Heap Memory Problem after Upgrading to 7.4
Hi Erick,
thank you for your answer.
Unfortunately I do not have a heap dump from 6.6.
> On 3. Sep 2018, at 20:48, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> I would expect at least 1 IndexSearcher per replica, how many total
> replicas hosted in your JVM?
27 replicas per JVM.
>
> Plus, if you're actively
I would expect at least 1 IndexSearcher per replica, how many total
replicas hosted in your JVM?
Plus, if you're actively indexing, there may temporarily be 2
IndexSearchers open while the new searcher warms.
And there may be quite a few caches, at least queryResultCache and
filterCache and docum
10 matches
Mail list logo