On 6/24/2011 12:53 PM, Burton-West, Tom wrote:
Thanks for sharing this information. I also found that in our use case, for
some reason the default settings for the concurrent garbage collector seem to
size the young generation way too small (At least for heap sizes of 1GB or
larger.) Can yo
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for sharing this information. I also found that in our use case, for
some reason the default settings for the concurrent garbage collector seem to
size the young generation way too small (At least for heap sizes of 1GB or
larger.) Can you also let us know what version of the
On 6/24/2011 2:19 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
If possible, can you please share some details of your setup, like the
amount of shards, how big are they size/doc_count wise, what is the user
load / s.
Each full chain (there are two) consists of two servers with 2 quad-core
processors and 32GB of RAM.
If possible, can you please share some details of your setup, like the
amount of shards, how big are they size/doc_count wise, what is the user
load / s.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> In the past I have told people on this list and in the IRC channel #solr
> what I use f
