Thanks for your thoughts, Chris. I agree with you about the user's
experience. Snooth doesn't serve any ads/sponsored results -- the
goal here is to make sure that the most recent document the user has
acted on shows up top in searches for recent activity. My aim is to
forcibly preserve the
On 10/25/07 12:11 AM, "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this type of question typically falls into two use cases:
> 1) "targeted ads"
> 2) "sponsored results"
3) Best bets (editorial results)
The query "house" should return "House, M.D." as the first hit,
but that is rather hard
On 10/25/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : The typical use case, though, is for the featured document to be on top only
> : for certain queries. Like in an intranet where someone queries 401K or
> : retirement or similar, you want to feature a document about benefits that
> : wo
: The typical use case, though, is for the featured document to be on top only
: for certain queries. Like in an intranet where someone queries 401K or
: retirement or similar, you want to feature a document about benefits that
: would otherwise rank really low for that query. I have not be able
: So for example, to pop one document to the top of the index, i just run:
:
: "&q=field: value; id_700390+desc, date+desc"
:
: Works like a charm, even with multiple documents.
:
: "&q=field: value; id_700390+desc, id_604030+desc, date+desc"
be wary of this, sorting on a field (even a dynamic
That's the ticket exactly, Kyle.
What I have is the ID of my document, so I indexed a dynamic field
with name id_*. Then I just set that field for each document with the
proper ID.
So for example, to pop one document to the top of the index, i just run:
"&q=field: value; id_700390+desc, da
> The typical use case, though, is for the featured document to be on top only
> for certain queries. Like in an intranet where someone queries 401K or
> retirement or similar, you want to feature a document about benefits that
> would otherwise rank really low for that query. I have not be able
gt;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Runo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:17 AM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Forced Top Document
> >
> > I'd love to know this, as I just
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Forced Top Document
This method Charlie suggested will work just fine with a minor tweak.
For relevancy sorting
?q=foo OR (foo AND id:bar)
For nonrelevancy sorting, all you need is a multilevel sort. Just add
a bogus field that only the important document contains. Then sort by
On 24-Oct-07, at 10:56 AM, Charlie Jackson wrote:
Yes, this will only work if the results are sorted by score (the
default).
One thing I thought of after I sent this out was that this will
include
the specified document even if it doesn't match your search criteria,
which may not be what you
; Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:44 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Forced Top Document
>
> Charlie,
>
> That's interesting. I did try something like this. Did you try your
> query with a sorting parameter?
>
> What I've read suggests th
, but
it would be nice if solr could handle it for us.
> -Original Message-
> From: Charlie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:57 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Forced Top Document
>
> Yes, this will only w
mark angelillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Forced Top Document
Charlie,
That's interesting. I did try something like this. Did you try your
query with a sorting parameter?
What I've read suggests that
as
?q=foo OR id:bar^1000
Tried this on my installation and it did, indeed push the document
specified to the top.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Runo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Forced Top Document
al Message-
From: Matthew Runo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Forced Top Document
I'd love to know this, as I just got a development request for this
very feature. I'd rather not spend time on it
I'd love to know this, as I just got a development request for this
very feature. I'd rather not spend time on it if it already exists.
++
| Matthew Runo
| Zappos Development
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 702-943-7833
+
16 matches
Mail list logo
