On 11 June 2013 16:48, PeriS wrote:
>
> Nothing wrong and would work too, but I wanted to see if I could restrict
> it more as per the schema at http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/.
[...]
As per your other messages, constructing the query is under your
control. So, why do you care about such r
And besides, the user is not going to be aware of the actual field names to
query on - its abstracted to some simple names like author which could be a
combination of 100a,b which the application would know how to construct based
on an external configuration etc… You see what i mean.
On Jun 11,
Nothing wrong and would work too, but I wanted to see if I could restrict it
more as per the schema at http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/.
On Jun 10, 2013, at 10:09 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> What is wrong with, e.g.,
> stored="true"/>
>
> Regards,
> Gora
So what I m trying to do is index MARC21 fields which have a schema defined at
http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/. Now the reason I wanted to use dynamic
fields is so that once they are defined I don't have to touch the schema.xml
and control indexed fields configuration from outside i.e. a
One idea: DON'T DO IT!
Seriously, if you find yourself trying to "play games" with field names, it
says that you probably have a data model that is grossly out of line with
the strengths (and weaknesses) of Solr.
Dynamic fields are fine - when used in moderation, but not when pushed to
e
On 11 June 2013 07:24, PeriS wrote:
>
> I was wondering if there was a way to define field names that are more less
> dynamic in nature but follow a regular expression pattern. I know you can
> have asterisk either as a prefix or a suffix but not both or somewhere int he
> middle of a name.
>
Thank you for verifying the issue. I've created a ticket at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3407
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Field-names-w-leading-digits-cause-strange-behavior-tp3936354p3936599.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
Hmmm, this does NOT happen on 3.6, and it DOES happen on
trunk. Sure sounds like a JIRA to me, would you mind raising one?
I can't imagine this is desired behavior, it's just weird.
Thanks for pointing this out!
Erick
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:38 PM, bleakley wrote:
> When specifying a field na
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I remember the same, except I think I've seen the recommendation that you
> : make all the letters lower-case. As I remember, there are some interesting
> : edge cases that you might run into later with upper case.
>
> i can't think of *
: I remember the same, except I think I've seen the recommendation that you
: make all the letters lower-case. As I remember, there are some interesting
: edge cases that you might run into later with upper case.
i can't think of *any* reason why upper case character names i na field
would cause
I remember the same, except I think I've seen the recommendation that you
make all the letters lower-case. As I remember, there are some interesting
edge cases that you might run into later with upper case.
But I can't remember the specifics either
Erick
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Leon
Thanks Gora!
[ ]'s
Leonardo da S. Souza
°v° Linux user #375225
/(_)\ http://counter.li.org/
^ ^
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Leonardo Souza
> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Can i have a field name with a period(.) ?
> > Like in *fi
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Leonardo Souza wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Can i have a field name with a period(.) ?
> Like in *file.size*
Cannot find now where this is documented, but from what I remember it is
recommended to use only characters A-Z, a-z, 0-9, and underscore (_) in
field names, and s
From: Simon Willnauer [simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 2010 17:47
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Field names
>On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Peter A. Kirk wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> So it only finds 9?
>
>Since the "g
esults actually tell me?
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> ____
> From: Ryan McKinley [ryan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 2010 11:30
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Field names
>
> check:
> http://wiki.apache.
4 September 2010 11:30
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Field names
check:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHandler
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Peter A. Kirk wrote:
> Hi
>
> is it possible to issue a query to solr, to get a list which contains all the
> fie
check:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHandler
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Peter A. Kirk wrote:
> Hi
>
> is it possible to issue a query to solr, to get a list which contains all the
> field names in the index?
>
> What about to get a list of the freqency of individual words in eac
This seems to work:
?q=field\ name:something
Probably not a good idea to have field names with whitespace though.
-Jay
2009/8/28 Marcin Kuptel
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to query solr about fields which names contain whitespaces?
> Indexing such data does not cause any problems but I have been
18 matches
Mail list logo
