Tom Evans wrote:
> I do apologise for wasting anyone's time on this, the PEBKAC (my
> keyboard and chair unfortunately). When adding the new server to
> haproxy, I updated the label for the balancer entry to the new server,
> but left the host name the same, so the server that wasn't using any
> R
I do apologise for wasting anyone's time on this, the PEBKAC (my
keyboard and chair unfortunately). When adding the new server to
haproxy, I updated the label for the balancer entry to the new server,
but left the host name the same, so the server that wasn't using any
RAM... wasn't getting any req
We monitor them with munin, so I have charts if attachments are
acceptable? Having said that, they have only been running for a day
with this memory allocation..
Describing them, the master consistently has 8GB used for apps, the
8GB used in cache, whilst the slave consistently only uses ~1.5GB fo
Hi - what do you see if you monitor memory over time? You should see a typical
saw tooth.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Tom Evans
> Sent: Tuesday 21st April 2015 12:22
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Confusing SOLR 5 memory usage
>
> Hi all
>
> I have two SOLR 5 serve
