RE: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-06-20 Thread Teruhiko Kurosaka
Thank you for mentioning our product, Walter :-) > I've worked with the Basis products. Solid, good support. > Last time I talked to them, they were working on hooking them > into Lucene. So, Basis Technology's Rosette Language Platform has what we call "Base Linguistics" (basically a morpholo

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-05-28 Thread j . L
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've worked with the Basis products. Solid, good support. > Last time I talked to them, they were working on hooking > them into Lucene. > i don't know basis product. but i know google use it and in china, google.cnno

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-05-15 Thread Walter Underwood
I've worked with the Basis products. Solid, good support. Last time I talked to them, they were working on hooking them into Lucene. For really good quality results from any of these, you need to add terms to the user dictionary of the segmenter. These may be local jargon, product names, personal

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-05-14 Thread j . L
I don't know the cost. I know the bigger chinese search use it. More chinese people who study and use full-text search think it is the best chinese analyzer which u can buy. Baidu(www.baidu.com), is the biggest chinese search, and googlechina is the No 2. Baidu not use it (http://www.hylanda.c

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-05-14 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:38:22 PM > Subject: Re: Chinese Language + Solr > > if commercial analyzers, i recommend http://www.hylanda.com/(it is the best > analyzer in chinese word) > > On Thu, May 15, 2008

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-05-14 Thread j . L
if u can read chinese and wanna write ur chinese-analyzer,,, maybe u can see it http://www.googlechinablog.com/2006/04/blog-post_10.html 2008/5/15 j. L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > if commercial analyzers, i recommend > http://www.hylanda.com/(itis the best analyzer >

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-05-14 Thread j . L
if commercial analyzers, i recommend http://www.hylanda.com/(it is the best analyzer in chinese word) On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:32 AM, j. L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > u can try je-analyzer,,,i building 17m docs search site by solr and > je-analyzer > > > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Walter

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-05-14 Thread j . L
u can try je-analyzer,,,i building 17m docs search site by solr and je-analyzer On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > N-gram works pretty well for Chinese, there are even studies to > back that up. > > Do not use the N-gram matches for highlighting. They

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-05-14 Thread Walter Underwood
N-gram works pretty well for Chinese, there are even studies to back that up. Do not use the N-gram matches for highlighting. They look really stupid to native speakers. wunder On 5/14/08 2:03 PM, "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are no free morphological analyzers for Chin

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

2008-05-14 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
There are no free morphological analyzers for Chinese (are there for any language?) that I know. People tend to use one of the n-gram analyzers from Lucene contrib. I've used them before and they do OK. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message