In case anyone tries to do this... If you facet on a TrieField and change the
precisionStep to 0, you'll need to re-index. Changing precisionStep to 0
changes the prefix returned by TrieField.getMainValuePrefix(FieldType), which
then causes facets with a value of "0" to be returned.
-Michael
> Not really - it changes what tokens are indexed for them numbers and
> range queries won't work correctly.
> Sorting (FieldCache), function queries, etc, would still work, and
> exact match queries would still work.
Thanks. So it is just range queries that won't work correctly? That's okay for
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
> Is it safe to change the precisionStep for a TrieField without doing a
> re-index?
Not really - it changes what tokens are indexed for them numbers and
range queries won't work correctly.
Sorting (FieldCache), function queries, etc, would s