: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 12:31 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: CachedSqlEntityProcessor with delta-import
Why not use delete by id rather than query? It'll be more efficient
Probably not a big deal though.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Aniket Khare wrote:
> Hi Sowmya,
>
> I
7;${dataimporter.last_index_time}'"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Dyer, James [mailto:james.d...@ingramcontent.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:23 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>
> '${dataimporter.last_index_time}'"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dyer, James [mailto:james.d...@ingramcontent.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:23 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: CachedSqlEntityProcessor wi
ser@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: CachedSqlEntityProcessor with delta-import
Sowmya,
My memory is that the cache feature does not work with Delta Imports. In fact,
I believe that nearly all DIH features except straight JDBC imports do not work
with Delta Imports. My advice is to not use the Delta Import f
Sowmya,
My memory is that the cache feature does not work with Delta Imports. In fact,
I believe that nearly all DIH features except straight JDBC imports do not work
with Delta Imports. My advice is to not use the Delta Import feature at all as
the same result can (often more-efficiently) be
