, November 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Architecture Question
Hi Otis,
Thanks for your reply, just wanted to check what NoSql structure would be best
suited to store data and use the least amount of memory, since for most of my
work Solr would be sufficient and I
ate: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:47:40 -0500
> Subject: Re: Architecture Question
> From: otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> > I am not sure if this is the right forum for this question, but it would
> > be great if I coul
Hello,
> I am not sure if this is the right forum for this question, but it would
> be great if I could be pointed in the right direction. We have been using a
> combination of MySql and Solr for all our company full text and query
> needs. But as our customers have grow so has the amount of da
I'd separate the splitting of the binary documents from the sharding in Solr -
they're different things and the split may be required at different levels, due
to different numbers of documents.
Splitting the dependency means that you can store the path in the document and
not need to infer anyt
I'd just put the data in the document. That way, you're not
inferring anything, you *know* which shard (or even the
logical shard) the data came from.
Does that make sense in your problem sace?
Erick
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, JohnRodey wrote:
> I have an issue and I'm wondering if there
