ersonnel install versions until I got the needed
> functionality.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:12 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 'Stable' 4.0 versi
, 3.3, 4.0 all confuse me. I just had our
operations personnel install versions until I got the needed functionality.
-Original Message-
From: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: &#
As far as I know, Solr's trunk is pretty stable, so you shoundl't have many
problems with it if you test it correctly. Lucid's search platform is built
upon the trunk (
http://www.lucidimagination.com/products/lucidworks-search-platform/enterprise
).
The one thing I would be concerned is with the i
> geospatial requirements
Looking at your email address, no surprise there. 8^)
> What insight can you share (if any) regarding moving forward to a later
> nightly build?
I used build 1271 (Solr 1.4.1, which seemed to be called Solr 4 at the time)
during some testing, and it performed well
