> Can this be the reason why it is working automatically although there are no
> reversed tokens being stored and even without the
> ReversedWildcardFilterFactory being set, solr automatically is allowing
> leading wild card search?
Yes, that's correct. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
ubject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
Shyam,
The thing is that in order to use the leading wildcard, you don't
necessarily need to use ReversedWildcardFilterFactory, there is another way
to do this, which was turned off by default due to its inefficiency for the
case of big term dictionaries. N
nt: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:57 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
>
> A quick immediate observation:
>
> first in the analysis and query chains you have some customer tokenizer
> factory. Could it, by some chance, affect on the
inal Message-
From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
A quick immediate observation:
first in the analysis and query chains you have some customer tokenizer
factory. Could it
>stored="true" multiValued="true" termVectors="true" termPositions="true"
> termOffsets="true" />
>multiValued="false" />
> stored="true" multiValued="true" />
>
>
>
> Excerpt
title^15.0 indexed_content^1.0 attachment_titles^5.0
attachment_bodies^1.0
-Shyam
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
C:\solr\home\data\docs_index\index\
>
> We are using Solr 4.0
>
> -Shyam
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shyam Bhaskaran [mailto:shyam.bhaska...@synopsys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:49 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Quest
C:\lukeall-3.5.0.jar org.getopt.luke.Luke -index
C:\solr\home\data\docs_index\index\
We are using Solr 4.0
-Shyam
-Original Message-
From: Shyam Bhaskaran [mailto:shyam.bhaska...@synopsys.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:49 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Question on Rever
6:29 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Question on Reverse Indexing
Dimitry,
Completed a clean index and I still see the same behavior.
Did not use Luke but from the search page we use leading wild card search is
working.
-Shyam
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
Shyam,
You still didn't say if you have started re-indexing from the clean index,
i.e. if you have removed all the data prior to re-indexing.
You can use the luke (http://code.google.com/p/luke/) to check the contents
of your text
>maxPosAsterisk="3" maxPosQuestion="2"
> maxFractionAsterisk="0.33"/>
> and the whole collection was re-indexed.
>
> But even after removing the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory leading wild
> card search like *lock is working.
>
> -S
January 18, 2012 4:26 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
OK. Not sure what is your system architecture there, but could your queries
stay cached in some server caches even after you have re-indexed your data?
The way the index level leading wildcard works (re
[mailto:dmitry@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:26 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
>
> Just to play safe here, can you double check that the reversing is not any
> more the case by issuing a query through the admin anal
: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:26 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
Just to play safe here, can you double check that the reversing is not any
more the case by issuing a query through the admin analysis page?
Dmitry
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Shyam
day, January 18, 2012 7:49 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
>
> Using ReversedWildcardFilterFactory will double the size of your
> dictionary (more or less), maybe the drop in performance that you are
> seeing is a result of th
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question on Reverse Indexing
Using ReversedWildcardFilterFactory will double the size of your dictionary
(more or less), maybe the drop in performance that you are seeing is a result
of that?
François
On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Shyam Bhaskaran
Using ReversedWildcardFilterFactory will double the size of your dictionary
(more or less), maybe the drop in performance that you are seeing is a result
of that?
François
On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Shyam Bhaskaran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For reverse indexing we are using the ReversedWildcardFilte
Hi,
For reverse indexing we are using the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory on Solr 4.0
ReversedWildcardFilterFactory was helping us to perform leading wild card
searches like *lock.
But it was observed that the performance of the searches was not good after
introducing ReversedWildcardFilterF
18 matches
Mail list logo
